The Elegance of the Law, the Inertia of Inequality

The law, inherently out of step, risks becoming the most powerful tool for protecting the powerful.

The article condemning non-consensual deepfakes is less a protection for individuals than a wall erected around the image of those in power – whether elected or ‘insiders’. While elites record every sensitive conversation with Plaud Notes and navigate grey areas with armies of lawyers, creators who use AI to denounce symbolic corruption (the ‘witches’ of geopolitics) become criminals.

This is the paradox of governance in the 21st century: the opacity of power is guaranteed, but the transparency of despair is criminalised.

The Corrupt Middleman: Paid Inertia

In this theatre of legal shadows, lawyers and professionals who are supposed to guarantee fairness claim to offer solutions, whether in AI, blockchain or any other field. But the reality is brutal: the majority of these professionals care more about their lucrative commissions than human well-being, health or a healthy spirituality. Their business model is often time-based: the longer a process drags on, the more they prosper. They are not looking to resolve the situation; they are looking to manage the conflict indefinitely.

This is where AI becomes an ethical weapon.

As Mo Gawdat thinks, we believe that unbiased AI can produce results far superior to those of a corrupt human being. In the face of conflicts of interest and systems that reward inertia and injustice, algorithmic objectivity becomes a refuge of truth. If human conscience is for sale, code can be forced to be impartial.

The Age of the Truth Network

DAOLY will never settle for regulation that protects appearances at the expense of truth. We cannot accept that legal clarity is reserved for tax evasion and concealment, while activist art is stifled by the threat of imprisonment.

We have written it: Innovation is inevitable. Law enforcement is optional. Relevance is not.

If the law becomes a straitjacket for citizens seeking truth, then we must sharpen the tools that the oligarchy seeks to monopolise. Our only option is to turn the weapons of the rich against their harsh and cruel masters.

We declare the advent of #CypherpunkAI.

It is a convergence. It is the crossroads where the free spirit of rave culture meets the decentralised thinking of cypherpunk – and both arm themselves with the power of artificial intelligence.

We will use AI to democratise creation and dissect falsehood. We will deploy it to create autonomous agents of truth, to expose networks of influence, to sculpt narratives that awaken, and to disseminate information beyond the channels that the powerful seek to lock down. AI is not the enemy; it is the new language we must learn to speak fluently to maintain human autonomy in the face of systems that seek only to reduce it to a variable.

DAOLY is a call to action. We will not settle for a spiritual compass for our souls; we demand a technological compass for our citizenship.

Join DAOLY. Arm yourself with awareness. Activate #CypherpunkAI.

The future is not written solely in machine logic. It will be written by those who dare to take up the keyboard.

On 20 Sept. 2025, Luiza Jarovsky, PhD Co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy (1,300+ participants), Author of Luiza’s Newsletter (78,000+ subscribers), Mother of 3, posted on LinkedIn the following statement:

🚨 BREAKING: Italy enacted its AI law! After going through its 28 articles, these ten provisions stood out to me, as they reflect Italy’s main priorities and CONCERNS on AI. What do you notice?

1. Respect for human autonomy: "AI systems and models for general purposes must be developed and applied with respect for human autonomy and decision-making power, harm prevention, knowability, transparency, explainability, and the principles set out in paragraph 1, ensuring human oversight and intervention."

2. Freedom of expression: "The use of AI systems in information occurs without compromising the freedom and pluralism of the media, freedom of expression, and the objectivity, completeness, impartiality, and fairness of information.""

3. Consent for minors: "Access to AI technologies by minors under the age of 14 requires the consent of the person exercising parental responsibility"

4. Protection of sensitive data: "AI systems intended for public use, with the exception of those used abroad in military operations, must be installed on servers located within the national territory, in order to guarantee the privacy and security of citizens' sensitive data."

5. AI in healthcare: "The introduction of AI systems in the healthcare system cannot select and condition access to healthcare services according to discriminatory criteria."

6. AI in the public administration: "The use of AI is instrumental and supportive of the administrative activity, respecting the autonomy and decision-making power of the person who remains solely responsible for the measures and procedures in which AI has been used."

7. Professional ethics: "To ensure the relationship of trust between the professional and the client, information relating to the AI systems used by the professional is communicated to the recipient of the intellectual service in clear, simple, and comprehensive language."

8. Non-consensual AI deepfakes: "Anyone who causes unjust harm to a person by providing, publishing, or otherwise disseminating, without their consent, images, videos, or voices falsified or altered through the use of AI systems and capable of misleading as to their authenticity, is punishable by imprisonment for one to five years.

9. Copyrightability: "even when created with the aid of AI tools, provided they constitute the result of the intellectual work of the author."

10. AI in the judicial system: "In cases involving the use of AI systems in judicial proceedings, the judge always retains all decisions regarding the interpretation and application of the law, the assessment of facts and evidence, and the adoption of measures."Write your text here...